A controversial topic discuss very much is the sexual consent age . Most grown ups believe that we should wait until were grown or married to have sex, Most mature young adults think other wise. According to the goverment the sexual consent age in Pennsylvania is 16 for males and females no matter your sexual orientation . Sometimes the age consent age is different for males and females . I believe that there shouldn't be a sexual consent age because if we the people are one and free we should be able to have sex when we choose to as long as we agree to it . Age of consent basically is a consent of age at which the law thinks a young person is able to understand and agree to consensual sex .
I personally believe that there should be no sexual consent age for the fact that it's a choice . If people put laws on our choices what real freedom do we have . If a person is 14 with the mind of a 20 year old he or she shouldn't be able to engage in sexual intercousre because they want to . I understand that some people aren't ready for it but when you look at it nobody knows what to do . When you look at sex you basically see it ever where on videos cause people now sexually stimulate themselves through the media.
In conclusion
Thursday, January 24, 2008
Thursday, January 10, 2008
Should Huck finn be taught at school
No I dnt think Huck finn should be taught at a public school. I dnt think huck finn should be taught at public school because he is not fit to be taught at public school. huck finn is way too ignorant too get along with others in school. huck finn will not properly a just to the way our school system works because of what he is use to. huck finn might be itimidated because of how ppl might treat him and tease him. so therefore no Huck finn should not be taught in school
Thursday, November 1, 2007
POG2
As you know over two hundred years ago our founding fathers created a constitution to protect our rights and to crate better justification to protect our rights. In America we have a lot of conflict dealing with our rights and constitution. Years ago our constitution didn't help us but since 1800 our constitution has change a lot. I do believe our constitution solves conflict because of a class simulation. I also think our constitution resolves conflict because of our human nature by the way we the people act and how our constitution makes it better. An example of how our constitution change over time because of case that dealt with an African American man name Dred Scott .
In a class simulation we came to a fault were we dealt with major conflict. We separated into different parts of our government and had groups such as a house of Reps., Congress. Citizens etc.. I was in the citizens group and played a major part dealing with the ideal to society. Within this group we tried to put a halt to the ideal to society which also dealt with the ichip. A citizen name Justin Bryant sued the government because of our constitutional rights using the 1st amendments 4th amendment and the patriot act. The 2/3 of the House of reps. tried to impeach the president because he was being unfair and doing illegal things. So this is an example of how our constitution resolves a conflict.
Another reason the constitution change over time to resolve conflict is because of the Dred Scott. The Dred Scott case involved the courts vs. Dred Scott. In this case Dred Scott filed suit for his freedom. After an eleven year case the Supreme Court finally said that Dred Scott should remain a slave. Around this time our constitution didn't resolve conflict for all Americans males even woman. Now our constitution wouldn't have taken eleven years to make a decision because Dred Scott wouldn't have to argue his rights for freedom due to the first amendment of our constitution as in WE THE PEOPLE.
Furthermore our constitution is great at solving conflict now. Our constitution resolves conflict due to our human nature because if we choose to do something that is bad to our constitution, we basically get checked because we choose to do wrong and we don't have the right to go against our constitution. When were at anywhere at all we have the right to amendment nine, which protects our privacy anywhere. So basically depending upon how we act or what we do our constitution can help us with our checks and balances and conflict and compromises.
In conclusion our constitution does effectively resolve conflict. It helps us in many effective ways to make our world better. It helped us in class simulation, which gave us a better understanding of how our constitution works. Also our constitution has effectively gotten better at resolving conflict since the 1800's and the dread Scott case. And finally it helps us in a way it affects to our human nature depending on what we do and how we act. So does our constitution effectively resolve conflict well yes I am afraid it does.
As you know over two hundred years ago our founding fathers created a constitution to protect our rights and to crate better justification to protect our rights. In America we have a lot of conflict dealing with our rights and constitution. Years ago our constitution didn't help us but since 1800 our constitution has change a lot. I do believe our constitution solves conflict because of a class simulation. I also think our constitution resolves conflict because of our human nature by the way we the people act and how our constitution makes it better. An example of how our constitution change over time because of case that dealt with an African American man name Dred Scott .
In a class simulation we came to a fault were we dealt with major conflict. We separated into different parts of our government and had groups such as a house of Reps., Congress. Citizens etc.. I was in the citizens group and played a major part dealing with the ideal to society. Within this group we tried to put a halt to the ideal to society which also dealt with the ichip. A citizen name Justin Bryant sued the government because of our constitutional rights using the 1st amendments 4th amendment and the patriot act. The 2/3 of the House of reps. tried to impeach the president because he was being unfair and doing illegal things. So this is an example of how our constitution resolves a conflict.
Another reason the constitution change over time to resolve conflict is because of the Dred Scott. The Dred Scott case involved the courts vs. Dred Scott. In this case Dred Scott filed suit for his freedom. After an eleven year case the Supreme Court finally said that Dred Scott should remain a slave. Around this time our constitution didn't resolve conflict for all Americans males even woman. Now our constitution wouldn't have taken eleven years to make a decision because Dred Scott wouldn't have to argue his rights for freedom due to the first amendment of our constitution as in WE THE PEOPLE.
Furthermore our constitution is great at solving conflict now. Our constitution resolves conflict due to our human nature because if we choose to do something that is bad to our constitution, we basically get checked because we choose to do wrong and we don't have the right to go against our constitution. When were at anywhere at all we have the right to amendment nine, which protects our privacy anywhere. So basically depending upon how we act or what we do our constitution can help us with our checks and balances and conflict and compromises.
In conclusion our constitution does effectively resolve conflict. It helps us in many effective ways to make our world better. It helped us in class simulation, which gave us a better understanding of how our constitution works. Also our constitution has effectively gotten better at resolving conflict since the 1800's and the dread Scott case. And finally it helps us in a way it affects to our human nature depending on what we do and how we act. So does our constitution effectively resolve conflict well yes I am afraid it does.
Tuesday, October 23, 2007
My Philosophy of government 1
An often-asked question is if government is necessary. From my perspective government is necessary to a certain point. This question alone can mean a lot and have many different answers. We do need structure and boundaries. I also believe that the government doesn’t help us to the point where we need them to help us. Government is a major thing but there are different types so which type of government is necessary. Like Adam Smith the government monopolies and controls. I think we shouldn’t have to choose between personal freedom and equality, because everyone should be free and we should all be equal and we can have both.
My personal belief on human nature is kind of like Adam smith, the government does monopolize and controls. I think the government monopolizes the world by having all the control and making all the laws and we the people have no say in what the laws should be made. I believe that human nature is that life should be live the way humans want to be treated. I think Adam Smith would say something simular to this.
Our government was designed to serve the American people, but what about our visitor’s do they have to follow the same rules and laws if they are not our people? Our government preserves our freedom and enforces laws that protect us. Why does the government preserves our freedom that like saving it. Do we really have any freedom? In the united states there are three levels of government. Government one is the federal government, which is the national level this government makes the laws and also enforces them. Then there is the fifty state government, which is the state level which makes and enforce laws for their respective states.
All nations of the world have some type of government but not all are alike. Regardless of the type of government, its leaders try to justify the amount of power that the government has. The government shouldn’t have power over their people if we are born free. We have a constitutional government which is a limited government. Even though this protects our leaders from abusing the powers that they have been given. We shouldn’t give any body power and no one should have to right to be a leader.
In conclusion maybe the people who are governed should set boundaries for we the people to do right. To me the government is too much and unnecessary at certain point and times. So is government necessary sometimes depending upon the situation and which on cause we do need the federal government.
My personal belief on human nature is kind of like Adam smith, the government does monopolize and controls. I think the government monopolizes the world by having all the control and making all the laws and we the people have no say in what the laws should be made. I believe that human nature is that life should be live the way humans want to be treated. I think Adam Smith would say something simular to this.
Our government was designed to serve the American people, but what about our visitor’s do they have to follow the same rules and laws if they are not our people? Our government preserves our freedom and enforces laws that protect us. Why does the government preserves our freedom that like saving it. Do we really have any freedom? In the united states there are three levels of government. Government one is the federal government, which is the national level this government makes the laws and also enforces them. Then there is the fifty state government, which is the state level which makes and enforce laws for their respective states.
All nations of the world have some type of government but not all are alike. Regardless of the type of government, its leaders try to justify the amount of power that the government has. The government shouldn’t have power over their people if we are born free. We have a constitutional government which is a limited government. Even though this protects our leaders from abusing the powers that they have been given. We shouldn’t give any body power and no one should have to right to be a leader.
In conclusion maybe the people who are governed should set boundaries for we the people to do right. To me the government is too much and unnecessary at certain point and times. So is government necessary sometimes depending upon the situation and which on cause we do need the federal government.
Monday, October 22, 2007
Photomontage
Naté-Monique: In this photo Ashante and I gave the peace sign and I blew a kiss to whom ever and ashante made a funny face. Before this photo was taken me and Ashante were singing love like honey by pretty ricky and on doing our POG 2. After this photo was taken Ashante and I started doing our blogs so we wouldnt get in more trouble for singin in humanities. At the time the photo was taken I was feeling kind of estatic lol and Ashante was happy as can be lol. The photo was taken because I had to do a photomontage and me and Ashante were already messing around. If I was to give this photo a title I would say Taeb0o & shaniibo0 in there baggs wat yu know<33
Thursday, October 11, 2007
Internert freedom VS. Society
Myspace is blocked because people think there are too many predators. To me facebook and myspace are the same thing buht myspace is more private to me.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)